Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> I think I'd like to see a separate patch for the new compression
> support. Sorry about that, I realize that's extra work
That part of the patch is likely to get rejected outright anyway,
so I *strongly* recommend splitting it out. We have generally resisted
adding random compression algorithms to pg_dump because of license and
patent considerations, and I see no reason to suppose this one is going
to pass muster.
regards, tom lane