From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kirill Müller <kirill(dot)mueller(at)ivt(dot)baug(dot)ethz(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Enumeration of tables is very slow in largish database |
Date: | 2012-01-12 22:10:13 |
Message-ID: | 16881.1326406213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kirill_M=FCller?= <kirill(dot)mueller(at)ivt(dot)baug(dot)ethz(dot)ch> writes:
> On 01/12/2012 02:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There were fixes for that in 8.4.9, so I'd be interested to know if you
>> get a better estimate in a more up-to-date version.
> Something weird happened today. The problem vanished into thin air. Plus
> we got our server upgrade to 8.4.9, but definitely after the problem
> disappeared. Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to capture an
> execution plan before the upgrade. The database has changed during the
> day, some hundred more tables with geometry columns were added.
> Anyway, I have attached the new execution plan, as produced by server
> 8.4.9 (squeeze/updates/main postgresql-8.4 amd64 8.4.9-0squeeze1+b1).
This doesn't seem to be for the same query --- I only see one antijoin
in this plan, whereas the plan you posted at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-01/msg00303.php
has two (and therefore doesn't match the query given there, either).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2012-01-12 23:56:54 | Re: Postgresql allow connections without password |
Previous Message | Kirill Müller | 2012-01-12 21:07:24 | Re: Enumeration of tables is very slow in largish database |