| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |
| Date: | 2008-07-07 19:36:09 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790807071236j7a69a345nff997e9acc9f66b7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/7/7 David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>:
> On Jul 7, 2008, at 11:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>>> Then why shouldn't I use strncmp() for all comparisons?
>>
>> I have no idea :-) -- because it's not locale-aware perhaps.
>
> Could someone who does have an idea answer these questions:
>
> * Does it need to be locale-aware or not?
yes!
> * Should I use strncmp() or varstr_cmp() to compare strings?
> * Shouldn't it use one or the other, but not both?
>
> Sorry, I'm just confused about the "correct" thing to do here. If someone
> who knows the definitive answers could weigh in, I'd be happy to make the
> adjustment.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-07-07 19:38:07 | Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-07 19:33:10 | Re: the un-vacuumable table |