Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command.
Date: 2011-06-18 13:19:54
Message-ID: 15974.1308403194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> On 18 June 2011 04:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I tested on FreeBSD 7.4 and saw a 1 error return:

> And on a Mac (so through Darwin 10.7.0 a BSD version too):

Yeah, see yesterday's discussion on pgsql-admin. I think the behavior
with the error return may be a BSD-ism. In any case, GNU cp does *not*
do what we want, and that accounts for a sufficiently large fraction of
machines in the field that I think it's just unsafe to suggest using
"cp -i" so prominently. There are too many people who'll just copy and
paste the first example provided, especially if the warning to test it
is buried several paragraphs later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-18 13:28:48 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command.
Previous Message Dickson S. Guedes 2011-06-18 13:11:58 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-18 13:21:39 plpgsql performance - SearchCatCache issue
Previous Message Dickson S. Guedes 2011-06-18 13:11:58 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't use "cp -i" in the example WAL archive_command.