| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Date: | 2014-03-05 17:19:16 |
| Message-ID: | 15394.1394039956@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> While there's certainly much to be said for the idea that jsonb should be
>> an extension, I don't think we have the technology to package it as a
>> *separate* extension; it'd have to be included in the hstore extension.
> I disagree with that. The shared C bits can live inside the core
> system and the SQL level hooks and extension specific behaviors could
> live in an extension.
That approach abandons every bit of value in an extension, no?
You certainly don't get to fix bugs outside a core-system release cycle.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-05 17:26:13 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-05 17:09:02 | Re: parallel pg_dump causes assertion failure in HEAD |