Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables
Date: 2011-10-10 16:58:51
Message-ID: 1463.1318265931@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This might be out of left field, but wouldn't it make more sense to
> get postgresql_fdw committed first, and then add the join push-down
> functionality afterwards? I mean, otherwise, we're going to be left
> with a situation where we have join pushdown in core, but the only FDW
> that can actually make use of it elsewhere.

There's likely to be a lot of FDW infrastructure that will not be
exercised by anything in core or contrib ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2011-10-10 17:06:02 Re: SET variable - Permission issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-10 16:53:54 Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor