Re: refresh materialized view concurrently

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refresh materialized view concurrently
Date: 2013-06-17 13:18:30
Message-ID: 1371475110.41199.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:

>> Changeset extraction has nothing to do with this patch, and
>> cannot possibly be useful for it.  Please keep discussion which
>> is completely unrelated to this patch off this thread.

> You mentioned "incremental maintenance" in your original post and
> I have been discussing it. Had you not mentioned it, I doubt I
> would have thought of it.
>
> But since you did mention it, and its clearly an important issue,
> it seems relevant to have discussed it here and now.

What I said was that I wanted to get this out of the way before I
started working on incremental maintenance.

> I'm happy to wait for you to start the thread discussing it
> directly though.

Cool.

-Kevin

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-06-17 13:19:13 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-06-17 13:12:12 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY