| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-02-19 22:38:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1361313504.17714.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure about information_schema, but we'll definitely
> want a pg_matviews system view.
> That could wait until 9.4, though.
That I could probably do. Do you think they should have a separate
pg_stat_user_matviews table, etc., or do you think it would be
better to include them in with tables there?
> Also a \dM.
I already added it as \dm in the current patch. Does that conflict
with something else that's pending?
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-02-19 22:45:10 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-19 22:30:52 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2013-02-19 22:43:27 | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-19 22:31:17 | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |