Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-03-03 23:13:04
Message-ID: 1330816012-sup-8375@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb mar 03 17:56:23 -0300 2012:
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb mar 03 16:54:19 -0300 2012:
> > Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of sáb mar 03 02:25:52 -0300 2012:
>
> > > 3. THE ARE NOT CARET - this is really important
>
> > I am not sure about the caret thingy -- mainly because I don't think it
> > works all that well.

It doesn't work correctly with your patch; see sample below. Note the
caret is pointing to an entirely nonsensical position. I'm not sure
about duplicating the libpq line-counting logic in the backend.

Also note i18n seems to be working well, except for the "In function"
header, "query", and the error level. That seems easily fixable.

I remain unconvinced that this is the best possible output.

alvherre=# create function f() returns int language plpgsql as $$
begin select
var
from
foo; end; $$;
CREATE FUNCTION
alvherre=# check function f();
CHECK FUNCTION
---------------------------------------------------------
In function: 'f()'
error:42P01:2:sentencia SQL:no existe la relación «foo»
query:select +
var +
from +
foo
^
(4 filas)

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-03-04 01:20:01 Re: archive_keepalive_command
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2012-03-03 21:15:59 Re: Memory usage during sorting