Re: unlogged tables

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-11-16 22:15:47
Message-ID: 1289945747.10258.2955.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:00 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Yeah, you'd have to allow a flag to control the behavior. And in that
> > case I'd rather the flag have a single default rather than different
> > defaults depending on whether or not individual tables were selected.
> > Something like --omit-unlogged-data.
>
> Are you sure we don't want to default the other way? It seems to me
> that most people using unlogged tables won't want to back them up ...

+1

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-11-16 22:19:25 Re: MULTISET and additional functions for ARRAY
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-11-16 22:12:10 Re: unlogged tables