Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Date: 2010-08-12 12:43:54
Message-ID: 1281617034.4463.7.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2010-08-11 at 15:06 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> You original email said:
>
> For some historic reasons, I have my local scripts set up so
> that they build development instances using the hardcoded port
> 65432.
>
> I think my response would be "Don't do that".

Do you have a concrete suggestion for a different way to handle it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-08-12 13:07:40 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-12 12:41:59 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment