Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Date: 2010-08-12 12:41:59
Message-ID: 1281616919.4463.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2010-08-11 at 16:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We should have the buildfarm configuration such that any one run uses
> the same port number for both installed and uninstalled regression
> tests.

I'm getting lost here what the actual requirements are. The above is
obviously not going to work as a default for pg_regress, because the
port number for an installed test is determined by the user and is
likely to be in the public range, whereas the uninstalled test should
use something from the private range.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-12 12:43:54 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-08-12 09:02:32 typos in HS source code comment