| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-13 14:38:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1258123083.14054.647.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, right now we ask for docs, but if they are not supplied, I think
> we just write them ourselves. Is a different enforcement method being
> suggested here?
And we never bump late patches, nor reject them if sent in missing
format etc.
We enforce all manner of rules. You tell me this is your main function
on the project even. Is there now no enforcement of any rule, just
because I propose a new one?
Address the main question: how will we get more review time? There are
many other possible proposals, so please lets hear them. (And how would
they be enforced?)
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-13 14:45:07 | Re: next CommitFest |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-11-13 14:31:21 | Re: next CommitFest |