Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-12-04 18:28:05
Message-ID: 1228415285.24775.42.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:20 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
> > I'm not the sort to be too concerned myself that
> > the guy who thinks he's running a DW on a system with 64MB of RAM might
> > get bad settings, but it's a fair criticism to point that out as a problem.
>
> In defense of thinking about very small configurations, I've seen many
> cases where an enterprise-software salesperson's laptop is running a
> demo - either in a small virtual machine in the laptop, or on an
> overloaded windows box. Even though the customer might end up
> running with 64GB, the sales demo's more likely to be 64MB.

Although I get your point, that is a job for sqllite not postgresql.
PostgreSQL is not a end all be all solution and it is definitely not
designed to be "embedded" which is essentially what you are suggesting
with that kind of configuration.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2008-12-04 18:40:25 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2008-12-04 18:20:48 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard