From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ali Dar <ali(dot)munir(dot)dar(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: missing rename support |
Date: | 2013-01-18 18:54:58 |
Message-ID: | 11703.1358535298@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Ali Dar (ali(dot)munir(dot)dar(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Find attached an initial patch for ALTER RENAME RULE feature. Please
>> note that it does not have any documentation yet.
> Just took a quick look through this. Seems to be alright, but why do we
> allow renaming ON SELECT rules at all, given that they must be named
> _RETURN? My thinking would be to check for that case and error out if
> someone tries it.
Agreed, we should exclude ON SELECT rules.
> You should try to keep variables lined up:
pgindent is probably a better answer than trying to get this right
manually.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-18 18:59:17 | Re: Event Triggers: adding information |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-18 18:46:18 | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) |