Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
Date: 2013-01-18 18:46:18
Message-ID: 11512.1358534778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> 'Extension Template' is fine, I was just objecting to places in the code
> where it just says 'TEMPLATE'. I imagine we might have some 'XXX
> Template' at some point in the future and then we'd have confusion
> between "is this an *extension* template or an XXX template?".

We already do: see text search templates. The code tends to call those
TSTEMPLATEs, so I'd suggest ACL_KIND_EXTTEMPLATE or some such. I agree
with Stephen's objection to use of the bare word "template".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-01-18 18:54:58 Re: missing rename support
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-01-18 18:26:51 Re: Event Triggers: adding information