Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Date: 2010-12-22 03:14:27
Message-ID: 11021.1292987667@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case
> (target == ALL)?

That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-22 03:15:41 Re: strncmp->memcmp when we know the shorter length
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-12-22 03:03:30 Re: How much do the hint bits help?