Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN
Date: 2002-07-04 21:29:28
Message-ID: 1025818169.250.138.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> We could change pg_attribute to another name, and create a view called
> pg_attribute that never returned isdropped columns to the client. That
> would allow clients to work cleanly, and the server to work cleanly.

Another case where having an informational schema would eliminate the
whole argument -- as the clients wouldn't need to touch the system
tables.

Any thoughts on that initial commit Peter?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-04 21:32:11 Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-07-04 21:27:27 Re: Scope of constraint names