Re: Scope of constraint names

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Scope of constraint names
Date: 2002-07-04 21:27:27
Message-ID: 1025818048.250.135.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Anyway, the index example is a
> > bad example isn't it? It already takes an lock on pg_class which is
> > just as global.
>
> Au contraire; there is no exclusive lock needed at present.

Oh.. I thought pg_class was locked for any relation creation. If thats
not the case, then I wouldn't want constraints to impose additional
limitations.

Misunderstanding on my part.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-07-04 21:29:28 Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN
Previous Message Jeff Glatt is a Dumbass 2002-07-04 19:17:56 Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly