| From: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details |
| Date: | 2002-04-19 02:24:41 |
| Message-ID: | 043b01c1e749$5cd7cd00$8001a8c0@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Will we be able to accomplish the equivelent of the below?
>
> I think what you're depicting is the equivalent of a schema owner
> dropping a table in his schema, right? Yes, I proposed allowing
that,
Yes, thats what I was looking for. Sorry if I missed that in the
initial proposal.
> > Yes, basically what we do now. I'm hoping to add the ability to
> > enable a group (ROLES) to have ownership of items as well as users
> > when I complete the other tasks I've set before myself.
>
> That could be a good extension, but I think it's orthogonal to the
> immediate issue...
Yes it is.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-04-19 02:34:19 | syslog support by default |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-19 02:22:19 | Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details |