JDBC Connection broken (followup)

Lists: pgsql-jdbc
From: Michael Bell <mikebell90(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: JDBC Connection broken (followup)
Date: 2009-08-17 08:00:10
Message-ID: 750530.72887.qm@web43140.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Oh, tried this with Windows firewall off, and AV off too. Here's the logging of the last few successful, and then the unsuccessful....

2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: connection received: host=127.0.0.1 port=3233
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3205
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: connection authorized: user=mjb database=retain
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3283
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.016 user=mjb database=retain host=127.0.0.1 port=3233
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: log_disconnections, .\src\backend\tcop\postgres.c:4024
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: connection received: host=127.0.0.1 port=3234
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3205
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: connection authorized: user=mjb database=retain
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3283
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.000 user=mjb database=retain host=127.0.0.1 port=3234
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: log_disconnections, .\src\backend\tcop\postgres.c:4024
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: 00000: connection received: host=127.0.0.1 port=3235
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3205
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: XX000: could not receive data from client: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.
2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: pq_recvbuf, .\src\backend\libpq\pqcomm.c:769
2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOG: 08P01: incomplete startup packet
2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOCATION: ProcessStartupPacket, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:1469


From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC Connection broken (followup)
Date: 2009-08-17 10:17:52
Message-ID: 4A892E50.6080402@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 17/08/2009 4:00 PM, Michael Bell wrote:
> Oh, tried this with Windows firewall off, and AV off too. Here's the logging of the last few successful, and then the unsuccessful....

It might be useful if you could:

- in pg_hba.conf, set 127.0.0.1 to "trust" or change the password
of the user you'll be testing with to something generic; then

- use Wireshark (http://wireshark.org/) to capture traffic on the
loopback interface during a failed login attempt that results in
the "incomplete startup packet" error.

- Change pg_hba.conf back / reset the password you changed

- Post the packet trace (libpcap format) or, if it's too big, put
it up somewhere people can download it and post a link to it.

Doing so may or may not help - but if the results look normal you at
least know the client is sending the right startup packet and it's a
server side problem.

"An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket" makes you
wonder if the socket was closed, the backend is getting FDs (handles)
mixed up, or something. I was about to suggest trying to get a log with
Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) but it doesn't look like Process
Monitor records TCP/IP socket activity, so it won't be much use. Sigh.

Maybe the wireshark trace will be informative...

--
Craig Ringer

> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3205
> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: XX000: could not receive data from client: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.
> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: pq_recvbuf, .\src\backend\libpq\pqcomm.c:769
> 2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOG: 08P01: incomplete startup packet
> 2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOCATION: ProcessStartupPacket, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:1469
>
>
>
>
>


From: Michael Bell <mikebell90(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC Connection broken (followup)
Date: 2009-08-17 16:00:42
Message-ID: 417177.39237.qm@web43135.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Thanks for replying. I changed the pg_hba.conf to trust (I don't care about the password, this is just a test system, installed from scratch). However, unfortunately WinPCap cannot capture loopback traffic, so that doesn't help us much :)

Other side notes: tried LSPFix - it found no problems. And I use this box to test MS SQL, MySQL regularly with no issues.

----- Original Message ----
From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:17:52 AM
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC Connection broken (followup)

On 17/08/2009 4:00 PM, Michael Bell wrote:
> Oh, tried this with Windows firewall off, and AV off too. Here's the logging of the last few successful, and then the unsuccessful....

It might be useful if you could:

- in pg_hba.conf, set 127.0.0.1 to "trust" or change the password
of the user you'll be testing with to something generic; then

- use Wireshark (http://wireshark.org/) to capture traffic on the
loopback interface during a failed login attempt that results in
the "incomplete startup packet" error.

- Change pg_hba.conf back / reset the password you changed

- Post the packet trace (libpcap format) or, if it's too big, put
it up somewhere people can download it and post a link to it.

Doing so may or may not help - but if the results look normal you at least know the client is sending the right startup packet and it's a server side problem.

"An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket" makes you wonder if the socket was closed, the backend is getting FDs (handles) mixed up, or something. I was about to suggest trying to get a log with Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) but it doesn't look like Process Monitor records TCP/IP socket activity, so it won't be much use. Sigh.

Maybe the wireshark trace will be informative...

--
Craig Ringer

> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: BackendInitialize, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:3205
> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOG: XX000: could not receive data from client: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.
> 2009-08-17 00:56:58 PDTLOCATION: pq_recvbuf, .\src\backend\libpq\pqcomm.c:769
> 2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOG: 08P01: incomplete startup packet
> 2009-08-17 00:56:59 PDTLOCATION: ProcessStartupPacket, .\src\backend\postmaster\postmaster.c:1469
>
>
>
>
>

-- Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc