Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
Date: | 2008-05-28 12:08:14 |
Message-ID: | 483D4B2E.80203@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
we would like to be able to use and ship pg_regress and the PostgreSQL
test suite independently of the PostgreSQL build environment, for
testing and maybe even as a separate package to be build and shipped
with the OS for others to test their setup. Does this sound like a sane
and OK thing to do?
I have a problem with one of the tests (create_function_1.source):
---------8<----------------8<----------------8<----------------8<-------
20 CREATE FUNCTION int44out(city_budget)
21 RETURNS cstring
22 AS '@abs_builddir@/regress(at)DLSUFFIX@'
23 LANGUAGE C STRICT;
24
25 CREATE FUNCTION check_primary_key ()
26 RETURNS trigger
27 AS '@abs_builddir@/../../../contrib/spi/refint(at)DLSUFFIX@'
28 LANGUAGE C;
...
35 CREATE FUNCTION autoinc ()
36 RETURNS trigger
37 AS '@abs_builddir@/../../../contrib/spi/autoinc(at)DLSUFFIX@'
38 LANGUAGE C;
---------8<----------------8<----------------8<----------------8<-------
(The ../../../contrib/spi-path does not exist outside of the build
environment, so to be able to run the test you need to have source code,
compilers, ...)
I could work around this problem by copying the needed shared objects to
@abs_builddir@ as part of make or make check, I could add a
“–look-for-shared-objects-here” parameter to pg_regress, and you
probably have other suggestions.
Is this something we want to fix, and what would be the right way to do
it? (I have no problem providing a patch.)
-Jørgen
--
Jørgen Austvik, Software Engineering - QA
Sun Microsystems Database Group
http://blogs.sun.com/austvik, http://www.autvik.net/
Sun Microsystems AS
Haakon VII gt. 7b
N-7485 Trondheim, Norway
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jorgen_austvik.vcf | text/x-vcard | 390 bytes |
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
Date: | 2008-05-28 14:27:19 |
Message-ID: | 27982.1211984839@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> we would like to be able to use and ship pg_regress and the PostgreSQL
> test suite independently of the PostgreSQL build environment, for
> testing and maybe even as a separate package to be build and shipped
> with the OS for others to test their setup. Does this sound like a sane
> and OK thing to do?
The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
want to look at the patches used there.
regards, tom lane
From: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
Date: | 2008-05-29 12:22:31 |
Message-ID: | 483EA007.4030404@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> we would like to be able to use and ship pg_regress and the PostgreSQL
>> test suite independently of the PostgreSQL build environment, for
>> testing and maybe even as a separate package to be build and shipped
>> with the OS for others to test their setup. Does this sound like a sane
>> and OK thing to do?
>
> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
> want to look at the patches used there.
Hi,
yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally.
Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something
like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of
the tests apply it?
[1]
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto
-J
--
Jørgen Austvik, Software Engineering - QA
Sun Microsystems Database Technology Group
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_regress_contribdir.patch | text/x-patch | 3.3 KB |
jorgen_austvik.vcf | text/x-vcard | 418 bytes |
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests |
Date: | 2008-05-29 23:19:45 |
Message-ID: | 8641.1212103185@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
>> want to look at the patches used there.
> yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally.
> Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something
> like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of
> the tests apply it?
> [1]
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto
I never particularly thought it would be useful to push that patch
upstream, but certainly it would make life a tad simpler for Devrim and
me. Since nobody else has objected, I'll look into doing this in HEAD.
regards, tom lane