Re: count * performance issue

From: "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count * performance issue
Date: 2008-03-06 06:15:06
Message-ID: bf54be870803052215y5bb56235k5ea05ada1d701022@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:08 PM, A. Kretschmer <
andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> wrote:>

> > am having a table with nearly 50 lakh records,
> >
> > it has more than 15 columns, i want to count how many records are there,
> it is
> > taking nearly 17 seconds to do that...
> >
> > i know that to get a approximate count we can use
> > SELECT reltuples FROM pg_class where relname = TABLENAME;
> >
> > but this give approximate count, and i require exact count...
>
> There aren't a general solution. If you realy need the exact count of
> tuples than you can play with a TRIGGER and increase/decrease the
> tuple-count for this table in an extra table.
>
>
>
Or do something like:

ANALYZE tablename;
select reltuple from pg_class where relname = 'tablename';

That will also return the total number of rows in a table and I guess might
be much faster then doing a count(*) but yes if trigger can be an option
that can be the easiest way to do it and fastest too.

--
Shoaib Mir
Fujitsu Australia Software Technology
shoaibm[(at)]fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sathiya psql 2008-03-06 06:19:08 Re: count * performance issue
Previous Message RaviRam Kolipaka 2008-03-06 06:10:05 postgresql Explain command output