| From: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Date: | 2009-05-06 14:28:46 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.00.0905061527410.2341@aragorn.flymine.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:04:33PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Can the genetic query optimizer come into play on small queries?
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> No.
Yes. But you would have had to have set some really weird configuration.
Matthew
--
And the lexer will say "Oh look, there's a null string. Oooh, there's
another. And another.", and will fall over spectacularly when it realises
there are actually rather a lot.
- Computer Science Lecturer (edited)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri | 2009-05-06 14:31:35 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2009-05-06 14:26:32 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |