| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Melnik <dm(at)ispras(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Eugene Sharygin <eush(at)ispras(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ruben Buchatskiy <ruben(at)ispras(dot)ru>, Roman Zhuykov <zhroma(at)ispras(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: JIT compiler for expressions |
| Date: | 2016-10-30 07:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HMcEa9SZjRyqZ7BzcMu-yE+-U68ULkFBqAPDJpYWHZ--g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This sounds amazing.
My only comment is that LLVM 3.7 is kind of old in the accelerated world of
LLVM. If you have patches to LLVM you need you won't have much success
submitting them as patches on 3.7.
The current stable release is 3.9 and the development snapshots are 4.0. I
know LLVM moves quickly and that makes it hard to try to track the
development. If you worked with 4.0 you might find the apis you're using
getting deprecated and rewritten several times while your project is under
development.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-10-30 07:43:12 | Re: sequential scan result order vs performance |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-10-30 07:36:55 | sequential scan result order vs performance |