Re: "stored procedures"

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"
Date: 2013-04-16 09:25:18
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC6uF1B=i_Di8hY=CB5dQ4K0QuKqkCAM3htVpH3FinsvQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

2013/4/16 aasat <satriani(at)veranet(dot)pl>

> Is "stored procedures" planned in future? I think is a "most missing"
> future
> today in Postgres.
>

It is in ToDo, but nobody working on this feature in this moment, probably.

>
> Using a dblink to emulate commit in transaction is very complicated
>
>
probably autonomous transaction will be implemented first - and should be
really nice feature.

Regards

Pavel

>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/stored-procedures-tp4331060p5752274.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Colin 't Hart 2013-04-16 09:40:16 [PATCH] Add \ns command to psql
Previous Message aasat 2013-04-16 08:44:44 Re: "stored procedures"