Re: pg_reorg in core?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date: 2012-09-21 13:32:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRRwmwd9QYNkmjGuA1aKau9J1bfOj2pH44yYqsDhuMwog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <
daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> > development, well I don't really buy that.
>
> I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.
>
> I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
> with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
> github fork.
>
> https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/
>
> I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
> the ownership.
>
Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in
pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2012-09-21 13:42:45 Re: pg_reorg in core?
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2012-09-21 13:30:31 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.