From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_reorg in core? |
Date: | 2012-09-21 13:32:32 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRRwmwd9QYNkmjGuA1aKau9J1bfOj2pH44yYqsDhuMwog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Daniele Varrazzo <
daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> > development, well I don't really buy that.
>
> I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.
>
> I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
> with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
> github fork.
>
> https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/
>
> I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
> the ownership.
>
Thanks, I merged your patches with the dev branch for the time being.
It would be great to have some input from the maintainers of pg_reorg in
pgfoundry to see if they agree about putting it in pgxn.
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-09-21 13:42:45 | Re: pg_reorg in core? |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2012-09-21 13:30:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries. |