Re: json accessors

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json accessors
Date: 2012-12-05 19:52:42
Message-ID: BBD0FA1B-5B7D-4DF3-8718-D0EE1FD98832@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>> So I'm happy with this stuff, as long as it does not get in the way of supporting indexing at some point in the future. I can’t wait to start using it!
>
> I don't see why it should get in the way of anything like that. If anything, the parser design changes I have proposed should make later development much easier.

Awesome, thanks!

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-12-05 19:54:57 Re: Dumping an Extension's Script
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-12-05 19:52:31 Re: json accessors