Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-07 04:39:24
Message-ID: 7609.1523075964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Given that the difference only appeared on animals that David pointed
> out have big-endian architecture, it seems we'd only need two output
> files.

Dunno, I'm wondering whether 32 vs 64 bit will make a difference.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 04:46:42 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-04-07 04:31:08 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning