On 12/17/2012 09:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think we should assume that the libedit developers are utterly
> clueless about not trampling on application namespace, and just cut
> that library out of *all* our link checks except for the symbols we
> specifically expect to get from libedit/libreadline. Hence, I propose
> the attached slightly more extensive patch. I've verified that this
> produces a working build with Debian's libedit.
>
>
+1. This being a family channel I'll refrain from expressing my opinion
too frankly of libedit.
cheers
andrew