Re: Dumping an Extension's Script

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dumping an Extension's Script
Date: 2012-12-05 17:40:58
Message-ID: 50BF872A.7050309@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05.12.2012 19:27, Andres Freund wrote:
>> And I still don't understand why pg_dump needs to know about any of this...
>
> Extensions should be fully per-database and we want pg_dump backups to
> be restorable into another database/clusters/servers. So having a mode
> for pg_dump that actually makes dumps that are usable for recovering
> after a disaster seems sensible to me. Otherwise you need to redeploy
> from the VCS or whatever, which isn't really what you want when
> restoring a database backup.

Ok - but that it yet another issue, not to be confused with how you
deploy extensions. If we are to have such a mode in pg_dump, it should
be able to dump *all* extensions, regardless of how they were deployed.
(ok, might be difficult for extensions that include .so files or
similar, but certainly for an extension that only contains a .sql file
and a .control file, it shouldn't matter how it was deployed).

And whether extension control files (or the same information stored in a
table or wherever) should be per-database or per cluster - that's *yet*
another separate issue. You could argue for either behavior.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-05 17:42:23 Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2012-12-05 17:39:35 Re: Slow query: bitmap scan troubles