| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, "Harold A(dot) Giménez" <harold(dot)gimenez(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation) |
| Date: | 2012-07-23 12:56:38 |
| Message-ID: | 500D4A06.2050404@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 07/23/2012 08:41 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> The buildfarm is not at all designed to test performance. That's why
>> we want a performance farm.
> Right. Apart from hardware, what are we stalled on?
>
Software :-)
I am trying to find some cycles to get something going.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-07-23 13:04:46 | Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation) |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2012-07-23 12:41:23 | Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-07-23 13:04:46 | Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation) |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2012-07-23 12:41:23 | Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation) |