Re: "stored procedures"

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"
Date: 2011-04-21 23:21:09
Message-ID: 4DB0BBE5.2070300@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/21/11 3:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe we should think about the SP controlling a second backend (or even
> multiple backends?) that's executing the "transactional" operations.
> dblink on steroids, as it were.

This is how people are doing this now (using dblink I mean).

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-04-21 23:26:45 Re: best way to test new index?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2011-04-21 22:57:20 Re: "stored procedures"