From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
Date: | 2006-05-09 15:51:39 |
Message-ID: | 4460BA8B.7010600@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
>
> Don't buy those drives. That's unrelated to whether you use hardware
> or software RAID.
Sorry that is an extremely misleading statement. SATA RAID is perfectly
acceptable if you have a hardware raid controller with a battery backup
controller.
And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard drive
capacity that you will get with SATA.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Purser | 2006-05-09 15:57:57 | Re: Exporting postgres query to CSV |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-05-09 15:49:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitchell Skinner | 2006-05-09 15:58:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-05-09 15:49:29 | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |