Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards
Date: 2018-04-27 00:20:40
Message-ID: 20180427002040.GC3419@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:09:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Have we given up on the angle of "prevent OldestXmin from retreating"?
> That seems like it'd be far more bulletproof than trying to work
> around places that break one-by-one.

Strong +1 on that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-27 00:25:19 Re: Typo in JIT documentation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-27 00:19:14 Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?