Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-07-03 17:36:20
Message-ID: 20130703173620.GF5667@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-07-04 02:32:32 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to fetch the toast index oid in the query
> > ontop instead of making a query for every relation?
> With something like a CASE condition in the upper query for
> reltoastrelid? This code path is not only taken by indexes but also by
> tables. So I thought that it was cleaner and more readable to fetch
> the index OID only if necessary as a separate query.

A left join should do the trick?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-07-03 17:38:13 Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-07-03 17:32:58 Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE