Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Date: 2012-12-05 17:14:09
Message-ID: 20121205171409.GB27424@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2012-12-05 18:08:01 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2012-12-05 11:40:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > Basically the whole logical arround recoveryApply seems to be broken
> > > currently. Because if recoveryApply=false we currently don't pause at
> > > all because we jump out of the apply loop with the break.
> >
> > Huh? That break is after the pause:
> >
> > /*
> > * Have we reached our recovery target?
> > */
> > if (recoveryStopsHere(record, &recoveryApply))
> > {
> > /*
> > * Pause only if users can connect to send a resume
> > * message
> > */
> > if (recoveryPauseAtTarget && standbyState == STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_READY)
> > {
> > SetRecoveryPause(true);
> > recoveryPausesHere();
> > }
> > reachedStopPoint = true; /* see below */
> > recoveryContinue = false;
> > if (!recoveryApply)
> > break;
> > }
>
> Oh, yea. I mixed what I read in the patch and what exists today in my
> mind, sorry for that.
>
> But it still seems rather strange that we break out of the loop
> depending on recovery_target_inclusive which is what recoveryApply
> basically is set to.

That part is obviously bullshit as we also set recoveryContinue = false
which means we will jump out of the loop later. Only after waiting for
another record though ...

Man, that file is confusing.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-05 17:17:20 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-05 17:08:01 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-12-05 17:14:10 Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-12-05 17:13:10 Re: Dumping an Extension's Script