Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-10 16:49:17
Message-ID: 200806100949.17918.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 10 June 2008 09:37, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > shared_buffers
> > effective_cache_size
> > default_stats_target
> > work_mem
> > maintainance_work_mem
> > listen_address
> > max_connections
> > the fsm parameters
> > checkpoint_segements
> > random_page_cost
>
> My list is very similar, execept that I drop random_page_cost and add
> synchronous_commit, autovaccum (on or off) and offer 4 "packages" of log
> settings.

Oh, and wal_buffers, the default for which we should just change if it weren't
for SHMMAX.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-10 18:13:38 Re: [CORE] Automating our version-stamping a bit better
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2008-06-10 16:46:37 Re: Proposal: GiST constraints