| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "sathiya psql" <sathiya(dot)psql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: oid...any optimizations |
| Date: | 2008-03-06 07:06:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20080305230650.67030d9c@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:32:01 +0530
"sathiya psql" <sathiya(dot)psql(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> i had a table with 50 lakh record...
>
> it has a column called oid ( obviously all the tables will have
> this ), but while doing any operation it is getting slow because of
> the number of records...
Actually it isn't obvious as oids have been deprecated for years.
>
> if i remove the oid column will i get any benefit, what are all the
> other default columns created without our knowledge..
What version of ancient PostgreSQL are you running exactly?
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sathiya psql | 2008-03-06 07:13:57 | Re: oid...any optimizations |
| Previous Message | sathiya psql | 2008-03-06 07:06:48 | Re: count * performance issue |