Re: Question regarding performance (large objects involved)

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Peter Childs <blue(dot)dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question regarding performance (large objects involved)
Date: 2003-06-26 11:37:52
Message-ID: 20030626113752.GB6568@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:33:10 +0100,
Peter Childs <blue(dot)dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, u15074 wrote:
>
> Need to be run after deletes and updates (a delete is actually a delete
> and an insert) if you do it with verbose on. Look at the vac number if it

Just to avoid confusion, the above contains a mistake (presumably unintential).
It should read "an update is actually a delete and an insert".

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-06-26 11:55:16 Re: Foreign keys
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-06-26 11:31:42 Re: How many fields in a table are too many