Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Date: 2018-04-03 00:07:41
Message-ID: 1B8F32ED-090D-48F0-9836-C94165817686@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Apr 2, 2018, at 17:05, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Don't we pretty much already have agreement in that? And Craig is the main proponent of it?

For sure on the second sentence; the first was not clear to me.

--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-03 00:27:05 Re: check_ssl_key_file_permissions should be in be-secure-common.c
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-04-03 00:05:09 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS