Re: "stored procedures"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"
Date: 2011-04-22 14:29:17
Message-ID: 17464.1303482557@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It wouldn't bother me in the lest that if in plpgsql procedures if you
> had to set up and tear down a transaction on every line.

It would once you noticed the performance impact ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-04-22 14:31:18 Re: fsync reliability
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-22 14:27:55 Re: What Index Access Method Functions are really needed?