Re: ALTER USER

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER USER
Date: 2003-03-17 14:19:54
Message-ID: 5842.1047910794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> Is it just the password that expires or the account? The comment for
> valid until says the password is valid until that time. However, one of
> the examples says the account is valid until that time.

Given the current implementation, I think it's correct to say that
the password expires not the account:

1. the userid isn't deleted or anything like that.

2. validuntil is only checked in password authentication methods; if you
are able to connect via a non-password auth method (eg IDENT) then it's
not checked.

I've never been quite sure whether #2 is a bug or a feature, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Galbavy 2003-03-17 14:32:47 Re: ALTER USER
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-17 14:13:52 Re: transaction abort