Re: Support for integrated tsearch configuration
- From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
- To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
- Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Support for integrated tsearch configuration
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:54:18 +0200
- Message-id: <4866347A(dot)5060104(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
Hi,
I have five days, full time, to work on this new feature. Here is my idea:
Thanks to Dalibo :-)
:)
* add a "Text Search" node under the database node;
* add a Configurations node;
* add a Dictionarys node;
* add a Parsers node;
* add a Templates node.
Each of the four last nodes will have a property dialog.
I don't think there's much more things we can do to have a better
integration of the tsearch configuration.
Comments?
Sounds pretty straightforward - except there may be some odd side
effects of the 'Text Search node. Everything is pretty much designed
around the idea that we alternate between collection nodes and object
nodes. There are some exceptions - just don't assume it'll be entirely
simple!
Nothing is really simple on pgAdmin's coding (says the guy who tries
hardly to compile it under Windows since last evening... grmbl... :) ).
I was sure I was following the "collection nodes and objects nodes" way
of doing. Here are some ascii artwork:
- Databases (3)
+ DB1
+ DB2
- DB3
+ Catalogs (2)
+ Casts (0)
+ Languages (0)
+ Schemas (1)
+ Replication (0)
- Text Search
+ Configurations (2)
+ Dictionaries (2)
+ Parsers (2)
+ Templates (2)
Seems you're right. The Text search node is neither a collection neither
an object one. Unfortunately, I don't have a better one.
I need to think a bit more about this.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index