Re: further testing on IDE drives

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: further testing on IDE drives
Date: 2003-10-10 20:49:06
Message-ID: x7smm0om2l.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

>> Sounds reasonable to me. Are there many / any scenarios where a plain
>> fsync would be faster than open_sync?

BM> Yes. If you were doing multiple WAL writes before transaction fsync,
BM> you would be fsyncing every write, rather than doing two writes and
BM> fsync'ing them both. I wonder if larger transactions would find
BM> open_sync slower?

consider loading a large database from a backup dump. one big
transaction during the COPY. I don't know the implications it has on
this scenario, though.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Relaxin 2003-10-10 21:03:51 Re: One or more processor ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-10 20:43:17 Re: further testing on IDE drives