Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date: 2010-04-19 21:08:51
Message-ID: w2y603c8f071004191408lea9ba5b7q80a46b7839c73ec@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> > The only way I can think of to improve that without going back to flat
>> > files would be to develop a way for backends to switch databases after
>> > initial startup, so that auth could be done in a predetermined database
>> > (say, "postgres") before switching to the requested DB.  This has enough
>> > potential gotchas, in regards to catalog caching for instance, that I'm
>> > not eager to go there.
>>
>> Would it be possible to set up a skeleton environment where we can
>> access shared catalogs only and then decide on which database we're
>> using later?
>
> Eh?  We already do that ... In fact the autovac launcher is always
> connected to shared catalogs, without being connected to any one
> database in particular (cf. get_database_list)

Oh. Then I'm confused. Tom said: "as of 9.0, it's necessary to
connect to some database in order to proceed with auth checking". Why
is that necessary, if we can access shared catalogs without it?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-04-19 21:12:31 Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-04-19 21:04:07 Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection