| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Aaron Held <aaron(at)MetroNY(dot)com>, Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| Date: | 2002-09-24 09:44:42 |
| Message-ID: | tjc0pu0natpe9aid7m97bdpt82fvn8g50k@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:35:13 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>If you want to change 'current_timestamp' to
>conform to a rather debatable reading of the spec, [...]
Well the spec may be debatable, but could you please explain why my
reading of the spec is debatable. The spec says "during the execution
of the SQL-statement". You know English is not my first language, but
as far as I have learned "during" does not mean "at any time before".
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Knowles | 2002-09-24 12:25:09 | Postmaster Uptime |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-09-24 09:37:30 | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roberto Fichera | 2002-09-24 10:07:32 | Re: Problem on PG7.2.2 |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-09-24 09:37:30 | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haller Christoph | 2002-09-24 11:44:47 | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-09-24 09:37:30 | Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |