| From: | Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... |
| Date: | 2006-09-05 19:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | slrnefrjq5.2ea3.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2006-09-05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Right, I see the pgfoundry project as just a backwards-compatibility
> thing for anyone who doesn't want to change their code. I'm happy to
> put some cleaned-up functions into core right now (ie, for 8.2) if
> someone will do the legwork to define and implement them.
So you're prepared to violate the feature freeze to stick in a new API
that nobody currently wants to _use_, while forcing existing users to
resort to pgfoundry for a module that's been around for several major
releases?
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-09-05 19:30:24 | Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-09-05 19:25:19 | Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ... |