Re: JDBC compressed stream

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <jgagis(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC compressed stream
Date: 2005-06-17 19:41:24
Message-ID: s2b2e118.040@gwmta.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Since you specifically asked about other solutions than the JDBC driver
itself -- we use a middle tier which makes the JDBC requests. Clients
communicate with the middle tier through non-persistent queue-based JMS
(developed in-house) which can compress the message body. This works
well for us. If you run this middle tier on the database server, the
non-compressed data doesn't go "over the wire".

Alternatively, it would probably be less than a week's work to write a
JDBC driver which just forwarded the requests to a process which used
the postgres JDBC driver to hit the database. You would essentially
forward the requests and responses, with compression around those
portions which would benefit.

Just a couple quick ideas. Maybe it'll get you thinking in a direction
that will work even better for you.

-Kevin


>>> Javier <jgagis(at)gmail(dot)com> 06/17/05 11:26 AM >>>

. . .
Last question --> Anyone knows any other way to achieve compression
with other kind of solution???
. . .

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-06-17 21:28:51 Re: JDBC compressed stream
Previous Message John R Pierce 2005-06-17 19:12:45 Re: JDBC compressed stream