| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |
| Date: | 2010-04-19 21:52:56 |
| Message-ID: | q2r603c8f071004191452o2a29b01ew71e020621daad5d4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> Oh. Then I'm confused. Tom said: "as of 9.0, it's necessary to
>> connect to some database in order to proceed with auth checking". Why
>> is that necessary
>
> It's not, I just explained how to do it without.
Your explanation seems to presuppose that we somehow can't process the
database-specific rules before selecting a database. I don't
understand why that would be the case. Why can't we just check all
the rules and then, if we decide to allow the connection, select the
database?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 21:58:23 | Re: master in standby mode croaks |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 21:51:20 | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |